Endless entertainers – from Beyoncé to Lady Gaga to Mary J. Blige – have left their imprint during the Super Bowl Halftime Show. However, none came about in as much contention and hypothesis as Janet Jackson’s exhibition at the 38th Super Bowl game in 2004. Justin Timberlake broadly pulled a specific piece of Jackson’s clothing off, bringing about a genuine closet glitch from that point. The reaction for the circumstance, often alluded to as “Nipplegate,” was for the most part focused on Jackson herself. Notwithstanding, the vocalist presently has a sharp directive for the Internet in regards to who is or alternately isn’t to blame.

For setting, soon after the scandalous incident, there was a huge load of commotion from government officials and watchers the same that Janet Jackson had “sexualized” a family amicable occasion. They estimated that it was done deliberately as a PR stunt and, subsequently, Jackson was immediately disinvited from the Grammys that year. Her Damita Jo collection was likewise restricted from being played on MTV and VH1 too.

Justin Timberlake wouldn’t get as much fire for the Super Bowl trial at that point. However, in the new wake of fans scrutinizing his treatment of Britney Spears in the early aughts, the previous *NSYNC part at last saw some reaction for how he was treated in 2004 versus how the “Musicality Nation” artist was – and it’s sought  the official Hulu treatment. He has freely apologized, yet in her new Lifetime narrative, the most youthful of the Jackson family uncovered that she encouraged Timberlake to let her take the majority of the hotness for the circumstance. (Her beautician, be that as it may, has a few decision words for how Timberlake at last took care of things.) Jackson additionally said:

Honestly, this whole thing was blown way out of proportion. And, of course, it was an accident that should not have happened but everyone is looking for someone to blame, and that’s got to stop. Justin and I are very good friends and we will always be very good friends. We spoke just a few days ago. He and I have moved on and it’s time for everyone else to do the same.

The pop star continued in the documentary that being blacklisted after the wardrobe malfunction took a “toll” on her, adding that she was only able to “pull through” because of friends and family. In the four-part Lifetime series, several of those closest to her in fact backed up her side of the story, sayin that it was all an accident . Her brother, Tito Jackson, suggested that all the hoopla in 2004 was really due to Michael Jackson’s trial that was simultaneously gearing up. Her sister, Rebbie Jackson, claimed that her own kids witnessed Janet profusely crying immediately after the incident.

Likewise, Janet Jackson’s then-boyfriend, Jermaine Dupri, who was in the audience at the Super Bowl, firmly stated that the malfunction wasn’t purposely done to gain publicity. The notorious producer added that he felt compelled to leave his position on the board of the Grammys that year because of how they were treating Jackson.

In this day and age of the Internet, so many wardrobe malfunctions are laughed off that the 2004 Super Bowl issue is kind of an afterthought at this point. But hopefully, with Janet Jackson speaking the final word on it, there can be some closure and respect for what happened to her then. The full self-titled JANET JACKSON. documentary is available to stream on Lifetime and A&E.

Did you like this article?
Share it on any of the following social media channels below to give us your vote. Your feedback helps us improve.

close